The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has released the dates of their upcoming prevailing wage seminars for 2019. These seminars will be held as three-day compliance training workshops designed for regional stakeholders such as private contractors, unions, state agencies, federal agencies, and workers.
WHD 2019 seminars will be held in the following locations:
• Austin, TX, on June 18th – 20th
• Anchorage, AK, on June 25th – 27th
• Sacramento, CA, on July 23rd – 25th
• Washington, DC, on August 13th – 15th
• Indianapolis, IN, on August 27th – 29th
During the seminars conference participants, will cover the following topics: The Davis-Bacon Act and McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act; Executive Order 13658 “Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors”; the process of obtaining wage determinations and adding classifications; Executive Order 13495 “Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers”; the process for appealing wage rates, coverage, and compliance determinations; and compliance assistance and enforcement processes.
For more information or to register go to: https://www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts/SeminarsInfo.htm
The Department of Labor has announced that Cheryl Marie Stanton has been confirmed by Congress and officially sworn-in by Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, as the new Administrator of Department’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Stanton has been awaiting confirmation by the Senate since being initially nominated in September 2017.
Before coming to Washington DC, Stanton served in public service as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce. Under her leadership, the jobless rate in South Carolina was at its lowest point in almost 50 years. During this time, Stanton also oversaw the workforce system that helped place over 500,000 South Carolinians in jobs as well as leading two major information technology modernization projects that improved customer service and increased efficiencies for employees. Also, Stanton partnered with her colleague at the Department of Corrections to create the Second Chance job re-entry program for ex-offenders, receiving national accolades.
As the new administrator, Stanton will bring her breadth of experience to the Division, leading efforts in the enforcement of the federal minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, child labor requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and consumer credit protections. Additionally, overseeing prevailing wage requirements of the Davis Bacon Act and the Service Contract Act and other statutes applicable to Federal contracts for construction and the provision of goods and services.
There was a recent meeting between the Administration and key Democratic lawmakers which concluded in an agreement to seek a $2 trillion legislative infrastructure package to improve and repair the nation’s roads, bridges, waterways, and broadband networks.
In the meeting, President Trump, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer each agreed on the importance of investing in this country’s future and rebuilding America’s infrastructure. Pelosi and Schumer told reporters after the meeting that “we’re very excited about the conversation we had with the president”; calling it a “good and constructive start.” Likewise, the White House also appeared optimistic about the discussion with Trump stating “an excellent and productive meeting” with the Democrats.
The Democratic leaders further noted that the two sides found common ground on some of the priorities that an infrastructure plan should address. Following the meeting, Democrats sent Trump a letter which outlined government funding, environmental considerations and Buy American provisions as three key priorities.
To date, both parties have submitted separate funding proposals to achieve the infrastructure goals. Nevertheless, the funding source continues to be unclear even with bipartisan agreement on the $2 trillion investment amount. Future discussions are planned.
The U.S. Census Bureau announced construction spending for February 2019 was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,320 billion, 1.0 percent above the revised estimate of $1,307 billion in January. Compared to the same period last year, February was up 1.1 percent. For the first two months of the year, construction spending was $182 billion, up 1.4 percent for the same period last year.
While private construction spending in February was $994 billion, 0.2 percent above the revised January estimate of $993 billion; public construction spending was $326 billion, 3.6 percent above last month’s revised estimates of $314 billion. Compared to the same period last year, public construction was up 11.5 percent.
There were several contributors to public construction spending growth in February. The main contributor was Highway construction which was $111 billion, up 9.5 percent from revised January estimates of $101 billion. Compared to the same period last year, Highway construction is up 22.8 percent.
More information may be found at: https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/pdf/release.pdf
Fringe Benefit Group, Inc., an industry leader in the design, implementation and administration of benefits for hourly and part-time workers, and Century Healthcare (CHC), a north Texas-based company specializing in customized benefit plans for employers of all sizes with hourly employees, today announced they have combined – creating one of the nation’s largest providers of limited benefit medical plans. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
The combination brings together two highly regarded Texas companies specializing in ACA-compliant, turnkey solutions for employers with hourly employees.
“The combination of Fringe Benefit Group and CHC is a great fit for our employees, customers and brokers. CHC has an excellent reputation and has been in business for a long time and while we offer similar products, there is very little overlap in the customers we serve. Both companies have thrived during a period of great uncertainty in health insurance, which indicates there is a need for our products and I’m very excited about our future,” said Travis West, CEO of Fringe Benefit Group.
Michael Wilson, who has been CEO of CHC since acquiring the company in 2008, will become a shareholder, join Fringe Benefit Group’s board of directors and serve as a consultant to the company. “The CHC team prides ourselves for being flexible and adaptable in our ability to design, implement and administer customized benefit plans for employers of all sizes throughout the U.S. We are very excited about the opportunities ahead as we combine with Fringe Benefit Group. This will allow us to leverage and expand our capabilities and offerings to build a unique best of breed platform.”
About Fringe Benefit Group
Austin, Texas-based Fringe Benefit Group and its affiliate companies have helped employers design and administer fringe benefit programs since 1983. Through its nationwide network of independent brokers and agents, Fringe Benefit Group has established itself as the leader in government contractor health and welfare and retirement plans. Drawing on its expertise in the prevailing wage segment, the company has also emerged as a leader in group benefit plans designed specifically for hourly and part-time workers. For more information, visit www.fbg.com.
About Century Healthcare
Century Healthcare (CHC) is a full-service, licensed and bonded healthcare marketing and sales organization. The company specializes in the design, administration, and implementation of customized limited benefit medical plans and MEC plans for employer groups throughout the U.S. For more information, visit www.centuryhealthcare.com.
The U.S. Department of Labor announced a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) would be published to increase the weekly wage threshold to determine who is eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Employees earning less than the current threshold of $455 per week, which was established in 2004, must be paid overtime if they work more than 40 hours per week. The newly proposed threshold is $679 per week. The U.S. Department of Labor established this threshold based on comments from the public following a Request for Information in 2017, as well as six in-person listening sessions.
To be exempt from the new overtime proposal an employee must be paid a fixed salary, paid a weekly amount of at least $679, and primarily perform executive, administrative, or professional duties.
The public will have sixty days in which to provide comments once the NPRM is published in the Federal Register.
More information can be found at https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime2019/.
The U.S. Census Bureau announced construction spending for 2018 was at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1,292.7 billion based on spending in December. The value of construction during 2018 increased by 4.1 percent compared to the same period in 2017.
While private construction spending was $991.2 billion based on spending in December, public construction spending was $301.5 billion. In 2018, both Private and Public construction spending were up with Private up 3.4 percent and Public construction, almost double that, increasing 6.6% from spending in 2017.
There were several contributors to public construction spending growth in 2018:
More information may be found at: https://www.census.gov/construction/c30/pdf/release.pdf
GoBankingRates recently conducted two studies to explore what Americans are setting aside for retirement savings as well as why Americans might not be saving at all. Both reported findings that have troubling outlooks on retirement especially for the millennial generation.
The first study used three different targeted Google Consumer Surveys to find out how much the average American has saved for retirement. The surveys found that 42 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved which according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics is not enough to cover a year’s worth of expenses. Of these same 42 percent, 14 percent of respondents have nothing saved; this, however, has improved from 18.9 percent a year ago.
This study also found that results varied dramatically by age, with older Americans slightly better at saving. Those most likely to have nothing saved are the Millennials of which 57 percent report having $10,000 or less for retirement. Furthermore, 18 percent of this same group, millennials ages 18 to 34 have the highest percentage of respondents with $0 saved.
When it comes to money saved for retirement, women and men have a nearly equal percentage when looking at those who have no retirement savings. However, survey results show that women continue to lag behind men when viewing the results of those who have saved $10,000 or less. The survey found that 45 percent of women have no savings or $10,000 or less, compared with 40 percent of men.
The second study conducted looked at why Americans are not saving by creating a separate survey of more than 1,000 adults who had no money saved. These respondents chose from a variety of answers regarding what factors lead them not to save for retirement. About 40 percent of respondent said, “I don’t make enough money,” and 25 percent stated, “I’m struggling to pay bills.”
Although the most common reason for not saving among all age groups was not making enough money, the millennial generation was more likely to say they do not have retirement saving because “I’m prioritizing to pay down debt” and “job doesn’t offer a plan.” Meanwhile, findings show that 43 percent of women are more likely to report that they are not saving for retirement because they do not make enough money compared to men, at 36 percent. This study concludes that this “may help explain the gap in retirement savings between women and men that the other survey found.”
For more details about these studies go to: https://www.gobankingrates.com/retirement/planning/why-americans-will-retire-broke/
While the findings of these surveys are troubling in general, employees that work prevailing wage projects should be in a better position to accrue retirement savings.
Last week President Trump delivered his 2019 State of the Union address in which he called upon both parties to unite for a significant rebuilding of America’s crumbling infrastructure. Without going into specific details, the President remarked on the fact that regardless of one’s political position, many campaigned on the same core promise to rebuild and revitalize our Nation’s infrastructure that puts America’s interests first.
In his address, Trump acknowledged Congress’s eagerness to pass an infrastructure bill and his eagerness to work with them on legislation to deliver new and important infrastructure investment, including investments in the cutting-edge industries of the future. He called the need for improved infrastructure not an option but a necessity.
While lawmakers from both parties broadly agree that more infrastructure investment is required, some areas will require negotiations particularly concerning the amount of federal funding the plan would provide. As it is now, the plan calls for $200 billion in federal government spending, but Democrats have announced that they want to see five times that amount.
The Presidents tone throughout his address was optimistic about achieving a bipartisan plan to rebuild the nation’s infrastructure. After the speech, many Democratic senators weighed in admitting that an infrastructure package could gain support.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Court of Appeals) has requested the California Supreme Court to answer a question regarding prevailing wage coverage applying to offsite “mobilization work” that is non-construction, non-job site work based upon its tie to a public works project.
The Court of Appeals requested the California Supreme Court to answer the following question of state law: “Is operating engineers’ offsite “mobilization work”—including the transportation to and from a public works site of roadwork grinding equipment—performed “in the execution of [a] contract for public work,” Cal. Lab. Code § 1772, such that it entitles workers to “not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed” pursuant to section 1771 of the California Labor Code?”
Initially, the Ninth District Court found that since the offsite “mobilization work” was not dependent on any public works project for their existence nor an integrated aspect of the flow process of construction that plaintiff workers were not entitled to the payment of prevailing wages for off-site mobilization work. However, the Court of Appeals noted that California courts had not previously addressed the application of the State’s prevailing wage law to off-site mobilization work.
The California Supreme Court is expected to grant the request and decide the issues presented by the Ninth Circuit. The decision will impact workers who haul other equipment to public works sites.